Another blog post ( <http://tinyurl.com/3xzfkf> http://tinyurl.com/3xzfkf).
This is really aimed at skeptics of CZ.  Feel free to post it around
wherever our skeptics might be found.

I did an interview with ECT News earlier today, and inter alia they
suggested that the Citizendium had more of a command-and-control system than
Wikipedia, and asked for my reaction.  It occurred to me, then, that anyone
who actually contributes to CZ knows that this is wrong and unfair: as I
tell anyone who cares to listen, we're a robustly bottom-up wiki.  Our
authors and editors really do work shoulder-to-shoulder in a friendly
atmosphere.  I then considered whether the opposite might be more correct:
does Wikipedia have more of a command-and-control system than the
Citizendium?

Yes, Virginia.  Wikipedia has more of a command-and-control system than CZ.
You didn't know that?  Well, it's true.

Before you scoff, put your prejudices and what you think you know aside, and
consider.  How hard is it to get your edits on Wikipedia to "stick"?  If you
edit any even slightly popular article, how many self-appointed Defenders of
the Wiki will be standing over your shoulder, citing policy at you and
telling you you're doing it all wrong?  If you get into a dispute or
encounter some other problem, how quickly will an "administrator" arrive to
"lay down the law"?

Yeeeeaaah.  That's right.  Hmm.

By contrast, on the Citizendium, it's extremely easy to get your edits to
stick.  There are zillions of topics that are still wide open, or that need
great expansion.  We genuinely love it when new people get involved; we
won't shoo you off.  And how many self-appointed "managers" will your work
have?  If you're lucky, a few.  But, at this point, it's more likely you'll
have one or none.  If you like to work largely free of the typical Wikipedia
busybodies and know-it-alls, you'll find CZ much more congenial.  And how
quickly will editors or constables "lay down the law"?  Well, you can get
away with a lot on CZ, I'm afraid.  That's because people behave themselves
so well most of the time that we are genuinely surprised when someone needs
to be reined in.

Sure I'm a little biased, but I really love the CZ community!  (Group hug!)

I can virtually see you skeptics shaking your heads.  You want to ask: if I
go to add to an article, how often will editors show up and undo my work, or
tell me that I'm doing it all wrong?  Well, sure, that happens.  But, as far
as I can tell, not very often.  Our editors generally go out of their way to
treat everyone collegially.  This is one of the great discoveries of CZ: you
plop experts down in an open wiki community, and even give them some modest
authority, and guess what?  They're nice.  They do not wield their authority
the way Wikipedia administrators wield theirs.  For that matter, our
constables don't wield their authority the way Wikipedia administrators
wield theirs.  They're wonderful!

Now, I know that our wiki is open, bottom-up, and largely free of
"command-and-control" in part because we're still much smaller than
Wikipedia.  Yes, that's obvious.  Yes, I know that growth has a way of
making governance harder.  But that doesn't change the fact that we are for
now much freer and less constrained than Wikipedia is.  You know what?  If
you sign up, you can still edit our front page.  It's not protected.  And we
at least still have a chance to retain the more open, freer, more congenial
nature of our "small town" community as we grow; it's too late for
Wikipedia, which has become largely a "big city" mobocracy, one that I for
one find more oppressive than liberating.

Sure - in time, we on CZ will have far more collaborators than we might
always want, for our own individual work.  We too will start complaining
that too many cooks spoil the broth.  However that is, and however we solve
that problem when we are so fortunate as to have it, I also think that we
can avoid having this lively community devolve into a rude, controlling
mobocracy.  CZ's differences make all the difference.  We use real names,
which makes people more responsible and polite.  We require that people
treat each other  <http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/CZ:Professionalism>
professionally - and greatly cuts down on rudeness, just as moderating a
mailing list often has the same effect.  We separate different kinds of
authority, with different groups having only limited powers, and no person
being able to serve on more than one of the high-level groups in authority
(Executive Committee, Editorial Council, Constabulary).  This means that
nobody is in a position to lord it over others with impunity.  We actually
require that people agree to our fundamental policies as a condition of
their participation, which means that many of the most disruptive people,
whose silly antics cause Wikipedia administrators to react like Nazis,
aren't involved.  Maybe, just maybe, we've learned something from
Wikipedia's governance mistakes.

If you have been skeptical of CZ, maybe it's time to give us a second look.

--Larry

(Feel free to forward this!)

_______________________________________________
Citizendium-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.purdue.edu/mailman/listinfo/citizendium-l

Reply via email to