All, Here is another case of open collaboration between professionals and amateurs, with excellent results. Congratulations to Beth Noveck. I'm back from Europe...I'll post a paper soon. --Larry -----Original Message----- From: Peer-to-Patent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peer-to-Patent Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 1:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: {Disarmed} Peer-to-Patent a Success!
Email not displaying correctly? View <http://campaign-archive.com/?u=33d934c165e69e4b507504c2b&id=90facdefda&e=e6 3ef67543> it in your browser. <http://www.peertopatent.org?utm_source=Peer-to-Patent+Email+Announcements&u tm_campaign=90facdefda-Press_Release_6_19_2008&utm_medium=email> Peer-to-Patent Peer-to-Patent Releases First Anniversary Report Demonstrates Success of Public Participation in Patent Process New York, N.Y. (June 18, 2008) - Peer-to-Patent <http://www.peertopatent.org?utm_source=Peer-to-Patent+Email+Announcements&u tm_campaign=90facdefda-Press_Release_6_19_2008&utm_medium=email> , the groundbreaking Web-based governmental "social networking" project, has released a report on the results of its one-year pilot. Peer-to-Patent seeks to improve patent quality by connecting the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to an open network of scientific and technical experts to enhance the patent examination process. Launched on June 15, 2007 by New York Law School Professor Beth Noveck together with a network of corporate and academic collaborators and in cooperation with the USPTO, Peer-to-Patent is the first social networking project with a direct link to decision-making by the federal government. Under traditional practices, USPTO patent examiners bear the sole burden of identifying and relating information pertinent to patent applications. Under Peer-to-Patent, expert volunteers were permitted to assist in these efforts at the www.peertopatent.org <http://www.peertopatent.org/?utm_source=Peer-to-Patent+Email+Announcements&; utm_campaign=90facdefda-Press_Release_6_19_2008&utm_medium=email> Web site. With the consent of participating inventors, patent applications were posted to the Peer-to-Patent site where the expert reviewers discussed the applications and submitted bibliographic information, known as prior art, relevant to determining if an invention was new and non-obvious, as the law requires to obtain a patent. At the conclusion of the review period, this prior art was forwarded to the USPTO patent examiner for consideration and use in their further search efforts. Major companies such as IBM, Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard, Sun Microsystems, Intel, and GE, companies whose patent portfolios account for nearly one-third of the patents issued to the top 30 U.S. patent holders in 2007, all submitted patent applications to the Peer-to-Patent process. Other patent applications were submitted by Red Hat, Cisco, and Yahoo!, as well as smaller firms. Data from the first year of the Peer-to-Patent pilot shows that an open network of reviewers can improve the quality of information available to patent examiners and that such citizen-reviewers are capable of producing information relevant to the patent examination process and are willing to volunteer time. Initial results based on a survey of patent examiners from the USPTO suggest that information provided by the public is beneficial to the examination process. Findings from the first-year report include: * Peer-to-Patent attracted more than 2,000 peer reviewers. * The first 23 office actions issued during the pilot phase showed use of Peer-to-Patent submitted prior art in nine rejections. * On average, citizen-reviewers contributed 6 hours reviewing each patent application in the pilot. * Although USPTO rules permit third-party prior art submissions on pending applications, the average number of prior art submissions on Peer-to-Patent applications was 2,000 times that of standard rule-based submissions. * Ninety-two percent of patent examiners surveyed said they would welcome examining another application with public participation, while 73% of participating examiners want to see Peer-to-Patent implemented as a regular office practice. * 21% of participating examiners stated that prior art submitted by the Peer-to-Patent community was "inaccessible" directly to USPTO examiners. * Prior art submissions by Peer-to-Patent reviewers were four times as likely to include non-patent literature (any document that is not a patent, including Web sites, journals, textbooks, and databases) as compared to prior art submissions by applicants. "As the first example of harnessing public knowledge to improve a government process, the first year of Peer-to-Patent was an unquestioned success," Noveck said. She added: "While the impact of this project on patent quality will take longer to assess, the early indications are certainly promising." To view the Peer-to-Patent report in its entirety, visit:http://dotank.nyls.edu/communitypatent/P2Panniversaryreport.pdf <http://dotank.nyls.edu/communitypatent/P2Panniversaryreport.pdf?utm_source= Peer-to-Patent+Email+Announcements&utm_campaign=90facdefda-Press_Release_6_1 9_2008&utm_medium=email> . You are receiving this email because you are a valued member of the Peer-to-Patent community. Feel free to opt out of receiving future correspondence. Unsubscribe <http://list-manage.com/unsubscribe?u=33d934c165e69e4b507504c2b&id=6607d91ff f&e=e63ef67543&c=90facdefda> [EMAIL PROTECTED] from this list. Our mailing address is: Peer-to-Patent IILP 57 Worth St New York, NY 10013 Our telephone: 212-431-2368 Add <http://list-manage.com/vcard?u=33d934c165e69e4b507504c2b&id=6607d91fff> us to your address book Copyright (C) 2008 Peer-to-Patent All rights reserved. Forward <http://forward-to-friend.com/forward?u=33d934c165e69e4b507504c2b&id=90facde fda&e=e63ef67543> this email to a friend Update <http://list-manage.com/profile?u=33d934c165e69e4b507504c2b&id=6607d91fff&e= e63ef67543> your profile <http://www.mailchimp.com/affiliates/?aid=33d934c165e69e4b507504c2b&afl=1&ut m_source=Peer-to-Patent+Email+Announcements&utm_campaign=90facdefda-Press_Re lease_6_19_2008&utm_medium=email> Email Marketing Powered by MailChimp Web Bug from http://list-manage.com/track/open?u=33d934c165e69e4b507504c2b&id=90facdefda&; e=e63ef67543 <http://www.sng.ecs.soton.ac.uk/mailscanner/images/1x1spacer.gif>
_______________________________________________ Citizendium-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.purdue.edu/mailman/listinfo/citizendium-l
