Have posted the debate on PRAJA (refer link below) to enlarge the debate to
a wider section of public. Members are welcome to add comments there if they
so wish.
Muralidhar Rao
http://bangalore.praja.in/blog/murali772/2009/01/19/world-bank-gbwasp-a-different-conspiracy

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Muralidhar Rao <[email protected]> wrote:

> Well said, Vijayan. There's always been a debate over whether the
> politician is the bigger problem, or the bureaucrat. I have always held that
> even bigger than the two, there's another formidable force - the
> status-quoist. And, the solutions to the countries problems lies in tackling
> him.
>
> Muralidhar Rao
>
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Vijay Menon <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> When something is repeated over and over again and not disputed then
>> it is perceived to be correct. So let me write on this oft repeated
>> "so called conspiracy" by the World Bank on "poor developing
>> countries" and how we are all too blind too see their "sinister"
>> designs.
>>
>> Elsewhere is this groups I have also been named as someone who would
>> know the true inside story of GBWASP and how the World Bank and its so
>> called agent (need I name??) threatened to loot our 'poor country" and
>> state until the great  socialists came to rescue us!! They were
>> supposed to take over our resources, our water.
>>
>> Conveniently, as the argument goes, this privatization /take over of
>> resources was an unwritten agenda, a behind the scenes conspiracy.
>> So deep a conspiracy that the only ones who knew about it was this
>> same anti World Bank lobby. So much easier to invent a conspiracy then
>> really search for a real one.!!
>>
>> The point is all this kind of talk, is rooted in some ancient view of
>> the world of black and white, good and evil and also from the last
>> bastions of those who have "anti-America" as the core minded agenda.
>> Along with this "anti" stance is the anti capitalism, anti
>> privatization stances.
>>
>> The story is simply.(since I am supposed to know about GBWASP)  that
>> the World Bank. wanted in the project
>>
>> a) Transparency
>> b)Accountability
>> c) Citizen participation
>> (do these tenets seem familiar !!)
>>
>> And yes sustainability. That means a system where the project is self
>> sustaining, not forever dependant on subsidies. Free from political
>> and bureaucratic milking.
>> And not eating into tax payer's money in perpetuity…a commercially
>> feasible project. That's about it.
>>
>> It is this objective ( and yes the world bank does have sustainability
>> and commercial viability  as tenets) that was construed by this so
>> called citizen centric lobby to mean privatization of natural
>> resources, an extremely emotional issue which requires only wild
>> accusations for a project to grind to a halt.
>>
>> And remember, this same lobby had an unforgiving hate for the "agent"
>> who was responsible for the citizen participation part of the World
>> Bank agenda.
>>
>> And guess what ..the government did not refute the charges. It was in
>> their interest to limit world bank influence and citizen participation
>> for a mega project like this ( good money was available for milking
>> please !!)
>>
>> And that's the short story of how the anti America/anti privatization/
>> anti World Bank lobby played into the hands of the bureaucracy and
>> political class and destroyed something that could have been a
>> watershed infrastructure project, with an inbuilt watch dog mechanism.
>>
>> So in conclusion,
>> The World Bank is not lily white and blameless. No one is. But this
>> taken for granted stance that all things World Bank is a sinister
>> conspiracy, and the tendency to promote this as an  internal belief
>> system in CAF,is the actual sinister conspiracy!!
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Citizens' Action Forum" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/citizens-action-forum?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to