Found the following Northern Renaissance string packets in my guittar case:

At 415: 6th course: 22thou Brass medium-twist 2-stranded wire rope 5th
course: 18 thou Brass medium-twist 2-stranded wire rope
4th: 19 thou rose brass plain
3rd: 14 thou Rose brass plain

Don't have records of first and second courses. I remember spending about
100 pounds trying out different strings from NRI, and came to the conclusion
that the cheapest ones sounded best: brass. The silk basses were expensive
and utterly useless. With watch-key tuning it is only possible to stretch
the string a short distance. The silk would never settle within this
distance. The gut cores didn't sound good. The brass rings out beautifully. 

One further problem is the loops. NRI wouldn't make the loops big enough to
thread the pin through to secure the string at the foot of the guitar. I had
to widen the loops, but this weakened the string and they broke. NRI were
unsympathetic. Ephraim didn't believe me that the loops he made were too
small, and argued that there must be something wrong with my instrument. All
the pins are original and in good condition. He sent me a second set, but
again the loops were too small - suitable maybe for a 17th-century cittern,
but not an 18th-century guittar. I sent them back. In a phone discussion he
asked me to send my instrument to his house. No way. I finally managed to
get a set from him with big enough loops - and the they worked really well.
However, I had such a negative experience with Segerman that I refuse to
order from him again. I saught out a harpsichord maker in Edinburgh who
gives me quality strings with made-to-measure loops.

I really urge those of you who have original guittars to buy twisted brass
basses, even from NRI (ask for huge loops!), as it does make a HUGE
diference over modern alternatives. And they last. I've had the present
strings on for four years and they still sound great!

Rob




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to