This came over the listserve for the Wagner School at NYU.  It seems to
me it provides us with a clearer understanding of the events of last
week and appropriate cautions as to how we should proceed.  I expect it
also reflects the perspective of most individuals of middle eastern
heritage both here and abroad.  Please pass this on.  We need to combat
the hate that is rearing its ugly head in some places.

Linda


wagner-exchange listserve
 -------------------------

 A very enlightening statement -- perhaps if more people saw the
 situation from this perspective it may temper some of the
 bloodthirst that's been going around in light of the attack.

 By Tamim Ansary, an Afghan-American woman and
 writer living in the US.

 *****

 Dear Friends,

 Yesterday I heard a lot of talk about "bombing
 Afghanistan back to the Stone Age." Ronn Owens, on KGO
 Talk Radio [SF] allowed that this would mean killing
 innocent people, people who had nothing to do with
 this atrocity, but "we're at war, we have to accept
 collateral damage," and he asked, "What else can we
 do? What is your suggestion?" Minutes later I heard a
 TV pundit discussing whether we "have the belly to do
 what must be done." And I thought about these issues
 especially hard because I am from Afghanistan, and
 even though I've lived here for 35 years I've never
 lost track of what's been going on over there. So I
 want to share a few thoughts with anyone who will
 listen.

 I speak as one who hates the Taliban and Osama Bin
 Laden. There is no doubt in my mind that these people
 were responsible for the atrocity in New York. I
 fervently wish to see those monsters punished. But the
 Taliban and Bin Laden are not Afghanistan. They're not
 even the government of Afghanistan. The Taliban are a
 cult of ignorant psychotics who captured Afghanistan
 in 1997 and have been holding the country in bondage
 ever since. Bin Laden is a political criminal with a
 master plan. When you think Taliban, think Nazis. When
 you think Bin Laden, think Hitler. And when you think
 "the people of Afghanistan" think "the Jews in the
 concentration camps." It's not only that the Afghan
 people had nothing to do with this atrocity. They were
 the first victims of the perpetrators. They would love
 for someone to eliminate the Taliban and clear out the
 rats nest of international thugs holed up in their
 country. I guarantee it. Some say, if that's the case,
 why don't the Afghans rise up and overthrow the
 Taliban themselves? The answer is, they're starved,
 exhausted, damaged, and incapacitated. A few years
 ago, the United Nations estimated that there are
 500,000 disabled orphans in Afghanistan--a country
 with no economy, no food.

 Millions of Afghans are widows of the approximately
 two million men killed during the war with the
 Soviets. And the Taliban has been executing these
 women for being women and have buried some of their
 opponents alive in mass graves. The soil of
 Afghanistan is littered with land mines and almost all
 the farms have been destroyed. The Afghan people have
 tried to overthrow the Taliban. They haven't been able
 to.

 We come now to the question of bombing Afghanistan
 back to the Stone Age. Trouble with that scheme is,
 it's already been done. The Soviets took care of it .
 Make the Afghans suffer? They're already suffering.
 Level their houses? Done. Turn their schools into
 piles of rubble? Done. Eradicate their hospitals?
 Done. Destroy their infrastructure? There is no
 infrastructure. Cut them off from medicine and health
 care? Too late. Someone already did all that.

 New bombs would only land in the rubble of earlier
 bombs. Would they at least get the Taliban? Not
 likely. In today's Afghanistan, only the Taliban eat,
 only they have the means to move around. They'd slip
 away and hide. (They have already, I hear.) Maybe the
 bombs would get some of those disabled orphans, they
 don't move too fast, they don't even have wheelchairs.
 But flying over Kabul and dropping bombs wouldn't
 really be a strike against the criminals who did this
 horrific thing. Actually it would be making common
 cause with the Taliban--by raping once again the
 people they've been raping all this time.

 So what else can be done, then? Let me now speak with
 true fear and trembling. The only way to get Bin Laden
 is to go in there with ground troops. I think that
 when people speak of "having the belly to do what
 needs to be done" many of them are thinking in terms
 of having the belly to kill as many as needed. They
 are thinking about overcoming moral qualms about
 killing innocent people. But it's the belly to die, not
 kill, that's actually on the table. Americans will die
 in a land war to get Bin Laden. And not just because
 some Americans would die fighting their way through
 Afghanistan to Bin Laden's hideout. It's much bigger
 than that, folks. To get any troops to Afghanistan,
 we'd have to go through Pakistan. Would they let us?
 Not likely. The conquest of Pakistan would have to be
 first. Will other Muslim nations just stand by? You
 see where I'm going. The invasion approach is a
 flirtation with global war between Islam and the West.

 And that is Bin Laden's program. That's exactly what
 he wants and why he did this thing. Read his speeches
 and statements. It's all right there. At the moment,
 of course, "Islam" as such does not exist. There are
 Muslims and there are Muslim countries, but no such
 political entity as Islam. Bin Laden believes that if
 he can get a war started, he can constitute this
 entity and he'd be running it. He really believes
 Islam would beat the west. It might seem ridiculous,
 but he figures if he can polarize the world into Islam
 and the West, he's got a billion soldiers. If the West
 wreaks a holocaust in Muslim lands, that's a billion
 people with nothing left to lose, even better from Bin
 Laden's point of view. He's probably wrong about
 winning, in the end the west would probably
 overcome--whatever that would mean in such a war; but
 the war would last for years and millions would die,
 not just theirs but ours. Who has the belly for that?
 Bin Laden yes, but anyone else?

 I don't have a solution. But I do believe that
 suffering and poverty are the soil in which terrorism
 grows. Bin Laden and his cohorts want to bait us into
 creating more such soil, so they and their kind can
 flourish. We can't let him do that. That's my humble
 opinion.

 Tamim Ansary

=========================================================
"Magic Commands":
to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
to start it up gain click here:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL

 E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html

All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 1999 by its original author.

Reply via email to