What is the National Animal Interest Alliance?  I was very pleased to read
that the Puppy Protection Act was dropped, but was surprised when I read
this article, that they seem to support USDA Kennels as long as they are
"clean."  I may not be interpreting this correctly, but that's what it
sounded like.  When mentioning the problems with the act, it did not mention
the problem of having to keep your dogs in kennels if you had over four,
which seemed to be one of the biggest problems with the act.  It made me
wonder what the NAIA was, and I'm sure one of you can tell me.

Carol Richards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geocities.com/carolscavaliers/
"My little dog, a heartbeat at my feet."
                      Edith Wharton
  National Animal Interest Alliance
  For Immediate Release
  April 26, 2002
  Strand

  Good Intentions are not Enough!
  Conference Committee Strips Puppy Protection Act from Farm Bill  Hooray!
Today the members of the US House-Senate conference committee said "no" to
the so-called Puppy Protection Act (PPA) and omitted it from the final
version of the Farm Bill.

  After wading through reams of sensationalized material, Senators and
Representatives determined that, although it was drafted with good
intentions, the PPA offered only misguided, unenforceable public policy.
The failure of the PPA proves that leaving animal experts out of the process
produces bad results.

  "The PPA was inspired by special interest groups that fundraise using
emotional animal welfare issues," said Patti Strand, president of the
National Animal Interest Alliance. "As such, it was based on sound bites and
depended on evidence from those who aim to restrict all dog breeding. While
strongly supporting the elimination of substandard breeding operations and
thereby improving animal care, NAIA believes that any legislation designed
to do so should be grounded in science and reason as well as good
intentions."

  The American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) and the American Kennel
Club (AKC), organizations that also promote animal well-being and oppose
substandard breeding operations, also opposed the PPA.

  The Puppy Protection Act
  The Act had three provisions, none of which were acceptable to
knowledgeable dog professionals and enthusiasts.

  1. Breeding frequency: The PPA breeding frequency provision would have
created a precedent in the Animal Welfare Act (AWA) by transferring the
authority for breeding decisions from breeders to the federal government.
Doing so would have prevented even the most responsible breeders and owners
from working with their veterinarians to make appropriate breeding decisions
about the health and well-being of an individual animal. NAIA agrees with
the AVMA that the decision of when to breed or not breed an animal is an
animal health issue best left to professional judgment.

  2. Socialization standards: NAIA strongly opposes the imposition of
socialization standards before they are developed by the groups most
qualified to draft them. NAIA agrees with the AVMA that the socialization
provision was "premature and ill-advised" and supports the AKC's conclusion
that there is no basis in current science and no consensus among breeders,
  veterinarians or animal behaviorists as to what constitutes acceptable
"socialization standards."

  3. Enforcement provision: The "three-strikes-and-you're-out" provision was
so poorly written it could actually have hampered USDA's ability to revoke
licenses for a single violation that severely harmed animals and could have
led to regulatory abuses.

  NAIA Position
  NAIA opposes substandard breeding kennels commonly called "puppy mills"
and strongly supports their closure. The PPA, however, failed to effectively
address the most critical issue of enforcement and placed responsible hobby
breeders in the same category with irresponsible, large-scale breeders.

  The Real Problems
  The number one problem plaguing the commercial dog-breeding world is the
large number of commercial kennels that operate in violation of the AWA
without being licensed by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). Current
interpretation of the law hinders USDA from tracking pet store puppies back
to their suppliers, a situation that hampers the agency's ability to locate
illegally operating kennels. The number one priority for people who want bad
kennels closed is to identify the illegal operations that currently duck
USDA licensing requirements.

  Another problem is that large breeders in Eastern Europe and other foreign
locales have found a ready market for their puppies in the US. It appears
that the production of most of these puppies is totally unregulated. NAIA
would like Congress to consider legislation to assure American consumers
that the puppies and dogs sold in international commerce are healthy and
raised in conditions that would be acceptable under the AWA, regardless of
their country of origin.

  NAIA also notes that campaigns to stop pet overpopulation have been so
successful they have caused a shortage of puppies and small dogs in many
shelters. Rather than declare success and close their doors, some of these
shelters now pay for puppies and dogs and import them from other cities,
territories and countries so they will have dogs available for adoption.
  NAIA believes some of the rescue groups and shelters participating in this
relocation process are acting as dealers and pet stores and should be
licensed accordingly.

  In Conclusion
  The PPA was based on propaganda generated from a mixture of extreme cases
and a deliberate blurring of the distinctions between the bad kennels that
all responsible people want to close and kennels that operate within the
law, sometimes with superior, even state-of-the-art care and facilities. The
PPA was promoted by groups that depend on the emotional impact of
  legislative campaigns to raise money for their coffers and bring their
anti-breeding agenda into mainstream thought.

  "Everyone should be concerned about the well-being of animals," said
Strand, "but when we pass laws to regulate these operations, we need to make
sure that our decisions are based on facts and sound reasoning, not
propaganda. Otherwise our efforts will do little more than address
distractions while real problems remain unresolved. It's difficult to make
good decisions in an atmosphere where fundraising is paramount and
emotionalism rules the day."

=========================================================
"Magic Commands":
to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
to start it up gain click here:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL

 E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html

All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.

Reply via email to