In a message dated 5/12/2002 12:48:02 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Was I being unreasonable to pass on this dog because of this contract? Myra, I think you were very wise to pass on this dog with those stipulations. I have a feeling it would be more trouble than it is worth to you in the long run. I especially don't care for the set price for the puppy. And you can bet that as limiting as that contract is, there would be even more head-butting in the future. I recently gave up a dog to a co-owner whose contract limits just skimmed the surface. There must be many other dogs just as nice without those strict limitations, but even if there aren't I would pass. Go with your gut feeling on this matter. Liz Gordon Merrychase ========================================================= "Magic Commands": to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL to start it up gain click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.
