Here are two excerpts from emails in recent threads... > <<Would you please tell me privately the names of the 2 judges?>> > > <<They get pick from this next breeding and then half of the litter. We got > pick last > time and split the litter.>>
Judges who behave in the manner I have read in the first thread should NOT be protected by having their name withheld. The quickest way to end these behaviours is to share the information. Breeders who sign contracts like the one described above should not only NOT be protected by having their name withheld but since they presented the contract I would assume they think it is fair and should have no problem with the information being shared. Speculation is one thing but if the statements can be backed up as facts then the names should be publicized. Having said that I realize that because of fear of legal repurcussions AND that amid the facts and names would be speculation and names prevents this from being effective in a forum like this. (so you can stop cringing Kim) Isn't it a shame when society inhibits knowledge and truth. Dave CastleMyst Cavaliers http://members.aol.com/CMystCavs ========================================================= "Magic Commands": to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL to start it up gain click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.
