Pat,
Thank you for such a well stated email concerning the issues we face.
Patricia Powers Pratt Cavaliers
-----Original Message-----
From: Harry & Pat Barrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [CKCS-L] US Club Wars


>Ever since I joined the cavalier lists about five years ago, I have
>followed the rotational debates of CKCSC-USA vs ACKCSC/AKC.  As an outside
>observer I can clearly see that THE one original mistake make by the BOD
>(overestimating its own powers and underestimating the power of AKC)
>continues to divide your US cavalier population.  No amount of
>justification of either position (past or present) is going to change what
>you have today.  "Today" is your point of possible change and it starts
>with each one of you.
>
>Finally, there is talk of unity.  Even with this current debate, positive
>comments and clarifications are being made.  1)  Pet owners are primarily
>concerned about health issues; 2) CKCSC-USA breeders want access to ACKCSC
>cavaliers and vice versa; 3) Breeders do not want mandatory testing; 4)
>Accessibility and health testing should be separate issues; 5) there has
>been discussion as to which agenda item the BOD should consider first in
>order to facilitate the acceptance of ACKCSC cavaliers (health testing
>standards or reciprocal accessibility); 6) it has been stated that the
>majority of the voting membership of CKCSC-USA are pet owners (see #1); 7)
>the venues of each club have unique benefits that the other does not have,
>therefore both should be considered desireable.
>
>To my logics, the CKCSC-USA BOD and its membership should first pay
>attention to the wants and needs of the majority of its membership and get
>its house in order before inviting in new guests.  Once in order, the same
>rules would apply to everyone in it.  Your health registry is an enormously
>important instrument that can start your journey of CKCSC-USA and ACKCSC
>unity.  Through it, you eliminate the NEED for mandatory testing.
>Participation in it by both sides will show your "pet owners" your desire
>to do what is best for the breed.  Once your "pet owner" membership
>population is assured that the ACKCSC members have the same desires, they
>would logically not view the ACKSC/AKC as opposition.  Step two then could
>be addressed, ie opening up your breeding registries to accept ACKCSC/AKC
>cavaliers, thus satisfying the desires of the breeders.  Membership
>acceptance rules would have to be ironed out.  I don't think this would
>take a great deal of time.  My view is - pet owners/breeders are both
>focused on the future of the breed; however, they disagree on how the
>future of the breed can be protected.  Since the pet owners tip the scales
>in power, I would think it wise to acknowledge and act upon what it is they
>want.  In doing so, we all still benefit.  Without doing it, you will
>continue the discord, to everyone's detriment.
>
>Many have expressed their opinions, but how many are truly listening to
>what is being said?  I know for sure, that under the current conditions, I
>would certainly not want to be on either BOD.  They don't have the option
>of throwing up their hands and giving up.  They must make a decision.
>Instead of just providing all the reasons why something won't work; tell
>them what you do want.  Members clearly stating (without getting too wordy)
>what you do want, will soon show the BOD (by majority consensus) what
>decision must be made.  Unity should be the goal.  Figure out how to get
>there in the most expeditious way.  Likely, it will be one step at a time.
>Considering the issue in an "all or nothing" approach is overwhelming and
>generates negativity.  Each single positive step will also likely gain a
>momentum which will achieve your goal faster than you are currently
>encountering.
>
>BTW, our Canadian cavaliers are unable to (by way of governing rules of the
>Canadian Kennel Club CKC) to breed to CKCSC-USA only registered cavaliers.
>So, your club is not just restricting the ACKCSC/AKC cavaliers, but ours as
>well.
>
>
>Pat Barrington - Barrington Cavaliers (Southern Ontario-Canada)
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>=========================================================
>"Magic Commands":
>to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
>to start it up gain click here:
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL
>
> E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
>Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html
>
>All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.

=========================================================
"Magic Commands":
to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
to start it up gain click here:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL

 E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html

All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.

Reply via email to