Hi Shailabh, Can't test your controller as updating my kernel to e16 caused it to crash in scheduler_tick() doing some CKRM operation.
This is most likely because I am using my own ported version of the e15 v1 CKRM CPU controller. This will hopefully be resolved when Hubertus / HZ give me their e16 CPU controller sometime this afternoon. While I am waiting, I'll go ahead and turn off the e15 v1 CPU controller and give your I/O controller a shot. Marc -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Shailabh Nagar Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 7:00 PM To: Marc Fiuczynski Cc: ckrm-tech Subject: [ckrm-tech] I/O controller for e16 Here is another attempt to get the I/O controller working for e16. On my P4 SMT box, I'm able to run tiobench's in different classes though I don't observe a significant differentiation between the priority levels. OTOH, the depth of the I/O request queues formed by tiobench is pretty small so that needs to be eliminated as a cause by using an aio-based test. Please give it a spin. There's rudimentary documentation included in the patch. Marc, I'm getting onto the differentiation resolution now. Let me know if this controller creates problems like last time... Regards, Shailabh ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
