On Sat, 2004-10-09 at 17:05, Paul Jackson wrote: > Matthew writes: > > > CKRM aspires to be both a general purpose resource management framework > > > and the embodiment of fair share scheduling. > > > > I think your missing something here. CKRM, as I understand it, aspires > > to be a general purpose resource management framework. To that point I > > will accede. But the second part, about CKRM being the embodiment of > > fair share scheduling, is secondary. > > Ok - you may well be right that CKRM does not aspire to be the embodiment > of fair share scheduling. But doesn't it embody a fair share sheduler > (and no other such policy) as a matter of current implementation fact?
Yes. That is true, but it is by no means meant to be the end-all, be-all of CKRM. It is my understanding that the fair share scheduler is a proof-of-concept and an example of how to write a 'controller' for others, but not the full extent of CKRM's power. -Matt ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
