On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 15:58, Paul Jackson wrote: > Matthew wrote: > > One of the cool thing about using sched_domains as your partitioning > > element is that in reality, tasks run on *CPUs*, not *domains*. > > Unfortunately, my manager has reminded me of an essential deliverable > that I have for another project, due in two weeks. I'm going to need > every one of those days. So I will have to take a two week sabbatical > from this design work. > > It might make sense to reconvene this work on a new thread, with a last > message on this monster thread inviting all interested parties to come > on over. I suspect a few folks will be happy to see this thread wind > down. > > I'd guess lse-tech (my preference) or ckrm-tech would be a suitable > forum for this new thread. > > Carry on.
Sounds good, Paul. I think the discussion on this thread was kind of winding down anyway. In two weeks I'll have some more work done on my code, particularly trying to get the cpusets/CKRM filesystem interface to play with my sched_domains code. We'll be able to digest all the the information, requirements, requests, etc. on this thread and start a fresh discussion on (or at least closer to) the same page. -Matt ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
