"Marc E. Fiuczynski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I integrated CKRM with the kernel used by PlanetLab (www.planet-lab.org), > and I believe we (PlanetLab) are the first to use CKRM in a production > setting. > ... > Hope this helps.
It does, thanks. A concern which I have about the CKRM implementation is that the patches which have been sent out appear to be simply the "core" of CKRM, plus minimally-intrusive hooks. I have the impression that this core will not be terribly useful to real-world users and that follow-on patches will be required to add more functionality and to wire up more instrumentation and control points. I would not like to be in a situation where we merge the "core" patch, but the as-yet-unseen follow-on patches which make CKRM useful and complete end up creating a big unmaintainable mess. We end up not wanting to go forwards and being unable to go backwards. IOW: I think we need to see a reasonably-close-to-final implementation of CKRM before we can take it much further. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
