Peter Williams wrote:
Haoqiang Zheng wrote:
Haoqiang, was the macro intended to be used elsewhere ?
Where is this macro defined? I didn't find this macro in the CKRM cpu
patch for e16. Is it something added in e17?
It is in the CKRM e17 patch. Not the cpu patch but the ordinary one. It
seems to be being used by the delay accounting code.
BTW I've also noticed that you've reverted to the old CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
code in schedule() but are using the new version of dependent_sleeper()
which is inefficient when used with the old method. It would be easier
to pass "next" into that function (just like in the old version) instead
of it looking for it itself.
Also, have you tried compiling with CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU set?
Peter
--
Dr Peter Williams, Chief Scientist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aurema Pty Limited Tel:+61 2 9698 2322
PO Box 305, Strawberry Hills NSW 2012, Australia Fax:+61 2 9699 9174
79 Myrtle Street, Chippendale NSW 2008, Australia http://www.aurema.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
