>> What about your proposed sched domain changes? >> Cant sched domains be used handle the CPU groupings and the >> existing code in cpusets that handle memory continue as is? >> Weren't sched somains supposed to give the scheduler better knowledge >> of the CPU groupings afterall ? >> > > sched domains can provide non overlapping top level partitions. > It would basically just stop the multiprocessor balancing from > moving tasks between these partitions (they would be manually > moved by setting explicit cpu affinities). > > I didn't really follow where that idea went, but I think at least > a few people thought that sort of functionality wasn't nearly > fancy enough! :)
Not fancy seems like a positive thing to me ;-) M. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
