Shailabh Nagar wrote:

Sounds like a case is being made to make CONFIG_RCFS a "y" and eliminate
the possibility of it being a loadable module ?

No, I believe the idea was to make CONFIG_RCFS be automatically set to the same as CKRM.


Chris


------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech

Reply via email to