Hi Chandra ,
This conflict can be avoided in number of
ways.
One way is have pair of values to be
echoed
in reclassify file.
if user does :
#echo "$pid 0" > reclassify
then he is happy with current
functionality
#echo "$pid 1" > reclassify
then reclassify all processes and
move them to appropriate classes.
#echo "$pid" same as #echo "$pid 0"
I know there will be lot of better ways
to implement this but this is what i
think can be user friendly.
thanks,
--kiran
--- Chandra Seetharaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 07:37:19AM -0800, mehta
> kiran wrote:
> > Hi Shailabh ,
> > Will making it user configurable help?
> > i:e
> > if value echoed by user in reclassify
> file
> > is :
> >
> > "0" : do as it happens currently.
> > "-1" : reclassify all the process
> abiding
> > the rules specified. Processes
> not
> > following the rules should be
> kept
> > where they are.
> > "-2" : same as for "-1" but processes
> not
> > abiding rules should be put
> > in /rcfs/taskclass/members
>
> I agree with your need for the feature.
>
> One problem with using -ve number in this context is
> that it blocks
> the future plans to use -ve numbers for classifying
> all the tasks in
> a process group(like kill).
>
> I think Shailabh's proposal covers both
> grounds(provides you the feature
> and leaves the door open for future plans).
>
> chandra
> >
> > Negative values wont conflict with pid
> > explicitly specified by user to
> reclassify
> > a process.
> >
> > This gives user finer control over
> processes.
> >
> >
> > thanks,
> > --kiran
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Shailabh Nagar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > mehta kiran wrote:
> > > > Hi Chandra ,
> > > > It works perfectly as you told.
> > > > But won't this implementation give
> > > > problems to many Application using
> > > > CKRM?
> > > > Anyboby will expect members file to
> > > > contains process ids of processes
> > > > abiding the rules specified in rules
> > > > directory.
> > >
> > > > And changes to members file is done
> when
> > > user
> > > > echoes "0" in reclassify file , can
> this
> > > event
> > > > not be used to go through all processes
> and
> > >
> > > > place them in proper class ?
> > >
> > > It does go through all the processes...but it
> can
> > > only classify
> > > according to the rules explicitly listed. In the
> > > absence of an explicit
> > > directive from the user, the engine leaves
> processes
> > > where they are.
> > >
> > > It is recommended that a "catch-all" generic
> rule
> > > always be defined
> > > (with order set so that it is evaluated at the
> very
> > > end) which will
> > > place all processes NOT handled by earlier rules
> > > into whichever class
> > > you want (will typically be the root
> > > /rcfs/taskclass).
> > >
> > > I guess we could do that last action (place all
> > > unclassified ones into
> > > root) by default whenever all processes are
> being
> > > reclassified. We've
> > > been trying to avoid making policy decisions
> like
> > > that as far as
> > > possible and leave the flexibility/choice to
> user
> > > space.
> > >
> > > What do other list members feel about this ?
> > >
> > > -- Shailabh
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
-------------------------------------------------------
> > > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT
> > > Products from real users.
> > > Discover which products truly live up to the
> hype.
> > > Start reading now.
> > >
> >
>
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > ckrm-tech mailing list
> > >
> >
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage
> less.
> > http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
> >
> >
> >
>
-------------------------------------------------------
> > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT
> Products from real users.
> > Discover which products truly live up to the hype.
> Start reading now.
> >
>
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> > _______________________________________________
> > ckrm-tech mailing list
> >
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
>
> --
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful
> what you choose....
> - [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> .......you may get it.
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT
> Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype.
> Start reading now.
>
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> ckrm-tech mailing list
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
