Oops , sorry , that was my mistake. All files are available. thanks & regards, --kiran --- Shailabh Nagar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mehta kiran wrote: > > Hi , > > 1.CKRM Patches are based on mainline kernel > > sources structure. > > Redhat sources are organized in a very > different > > > > way. > > True but the rejects should be relatively small > atleast for the core > part - CKRM modifies very few existing kernel files, > most of the changes > are in new files created. > > There's no way to avoid spending some time on this. > We will not be > able to devote any time to providing a Redhat port > currently. > > > 2. Some files like fs/exec.c are not present. > > Patching seems to fail at many places. > > ?? Redhat sources don't have fs/exec.c ? Could you > check again ? > > > 3. Is Redhat planning to add CKRM in near > future. > > If yes , when ? > > Thats a question we'd like to know too :-) > > > -- Shailabh > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
