On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 12:01:45PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 11:26 -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:59:02AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 10:42 -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 07:10:50AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > > > What does "impl" stand for, anyway? implied? implicit? implemented?
> > > >
> > > > I meant implicit... you can also say implied.... will add in comments to
> > > > the dats structure definition.
> > >
> > > How about changing the name of the structure member? Comments suck.
> >
> > you mean explicit name like implicit_guarantee ? if comments suck, IMHO,
> > impl_guar is good enough an option for a field that holds implicit
> > guarantee.
>
> I think you possibly suffer from an a case of ibmersdontlikevowelsitis
> which seems to be endemic to our company. In case you're wondering,
> Linus already found our missing vowels:
>
> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0110.1/1294.html
To my knowledge, 'i', 'u' and 'a' are vowels(impl_guar).... May be I
am wrong.. I think I 've relearn my alphabets.
BTW, Can you point me to the latest version ?
Seriously, I don't get your argument that 'impl_guar' doesn't imply
implicit guarantee....(especially even after I agreed that I would add some
comments)
>
> -- Dave
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose....
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
