--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose....
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
recalc and propagate was not checking for class's my_guarantee and
my_limit againt DONT_CARE. This was leading to different wierd
problems. This patch fixes it.
This patch applies over PATCH 7/8 of Gerrit's recent patchset.
Index: linux-2.6.12-rc1/kernel/ckrm/ckrm_numtasks.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.12-rc1.orig/kernel/ckrm/ckrm_numtasks.c
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc1/kernel/ckrm/ckrm_numtasks.c
@@ -296,7 +296,8 @@ recalc_and_propagate(struct ckrm_numtask
struct ckrm_shares *self = &res->shares;
/* calculate cnt_guarantee and cnt_limit */
- if (parres->cnt_guarantee == CKRM_SHARE_DONTCARE) {
+ if ((parres->cnt_guarantee == CKRM_SHARE_DONTCARE) ||
+ (self->my_guarantee == CKRM_SHARE_DONTCARE)) {
res->cnt_guarantee = CKRM_SHARE_DONTCARE;
} else if (par->total_guarantee) {
u64 temp = (u64) self->my_guarantee *
parres->cnt_guarantee;
@@ -306,7 +307,8 @@ recalc_and_propagate(struct ckrm_numtask
res->cnt_guarantee = 0;
}
- if (parres->cnt_limit == CKRM_SHARE_DONTCARE) {
+ if ((parres->cnt_limit == CKRM_SHARE_DONTCARE) ||
+ (self->my_limit == CKRM_SHARE_DONTCARE)) {
res->cnt_limit = CKRM_SHARE_DONTCARE;
} else if (par->max_limit) {
u64 temp = (u64) self->my_limit * parres->cnt_limit;
@@ -317,7 +319,8 @@ recalc_and_propagate(struct ckrm_numtask
}
/* Calculate unused units */
- if (res->cnt_guarantee == CKRM_SHARE_DONTCARE) {
+ if ((res->cnt_guarantee == CKRM_SHARE_DONTCARE) ||
+ (self->my_guarantee == CKRM_SHARE_DONTCARE)) {
res->cnt_unused = CKRM_SHARE_DONTCARE;
} else if (self->total_guarantee) {
u64 temp = (u64) self->unused_guarantee *
res->cnt_guarantee;
