On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 02:40:51PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 14:27 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > These results represent running the following benchmarks on a true NUMA > > machine (16-way with 32GB of RAM). To make the table somewhat less wide, > > the following convention has been adopted: > > Thanks for posting those thorough results. Not having more than a 1% > deviation for any of the relevant tests is impressive.
Yes, ignoring SPECjbb results for NUMA leads me to conclude that, at least CKRM=n, leads to very little change. Thanks, Nish ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: New Crystal Reports XI. Version 11 adds new functionality designed to reduce time involved in creating, integrating, and deploying reporting solutions. Free runtime info, new features, or free trial, at: http://www.businessobjects.com/devxi/728 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
