On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 09:59 -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 02:49:42AM -0700, Matthew Helsley wrote:
> 
> Matt,
> 
> This leads to circular dependency... I think the later one is using options
> which is the one that should stay
> 
> chandra
<snip>
> >  config CKRM_RBCE
> >     tristate "Vanilla Rule-based Classification Engine (RBCE)"
> > -   depends on CKRM && RCFS_FS
> > +   depends on CKRM && RCFS_FS && CKRM_CRBCE != y

<snip>
 
> >  config CKRM_CRBCE
> >     tristate "Enhanced Rule-based Classification Engine (RBCE)"
> > -   depends on CKRM && RCFS_FS && DELAY_ACCT
> > +   depends on CKRM && RCFS_FS && DELAY_ACCT && CKRM_RBCE != y && NET
> >     default m

<snip>

        I don't think it's circular -- the terms I think you are referring to
use != instead of =. Also of note, the values used in the comparisons
allow for both being built as modules (CKRM_RBCE == m != y). Lastly, the
only part of the depends on line not in the original patch is the NET
dependency for CRBCE (since it now uses netlink sockets instead of
RCFS).

Cheers,
        -Matt



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech

Reply via email to