On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 23:11 +0900, Naoaki Maeda wrote:
> Hi Chandra,
>
> Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
>
> > It is not a limit, it is the system level number of tasks assumed by the
> > numtasks controller, so, it cannot be a _no limit_, it has to be real
> > number.
>
> If the magic numner 131072 is not hard coded in the numtask source code
> and copied from the kernel parameter in runtime, it makes sense.
you mean as an argument to kernel ? we still need to keep some number
internally (to use when the user does not specify the config parameter).
I see your concern, will see what can be done to avoid the problem.
> But, copying magic number is ugly.
>
> Thanks,
> MAEDA Naoaki
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose....
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
