On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 17:46 -0700, Paul Menage wrote: > On 9/8/05, Chandra Seetharaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > But I am currently working on removing the classtype support in order to > > reduce the complexity ( it was one of the main problem the community > > sees with CKRM). > > What will these changes look like (from userspace and from inside the kernel)?
In the kernel, classtype data structure is removed and all the indirections from core/rcfs to classtype will be replaced. >From the userland, we will see only /rcfs as the directory and task related classes directly under it. > > Thanks, > > Paul > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > ckrm-tech mailing list > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose.... - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | .......you may get it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
