----- Original Message ----- From: "MAEDA Naoaki" > Hi Chandra, > > I believe that simplifying CKRM is the right thing to do. > At first glance, I have some questions and comments.
Yeah, me too. Humour me a little here folks - what the hell's going on ???. Are we forking or what ???. I built a 2.6.13.system (at work) when I saw Chandras posts - clean start, sounds good. Unfortunately, I had to pick the patches up from the (web-interface) archive, and it appears there must be a limit on the number of lines. Hence the patches were incomplete - I had to junk that build. O.K., that happens. Then I get home to a truck-load of patches from Gerrit. So tell me - what the hell am I supposed to apply to what ???. I *really* would like to be involved here, but I'm new, and I just can't work out where you're all heading. - do I go with Chandra on a 2.6.13 build, and look at that as the future direction - do I patch (some/any of ???) Gerrits updates on top of that - do I add (some of) Gerrits patches to the (incomplete) e18 I am currently fighting with. - do I give up on this altogether, and go look at LKCD as something to occupy my idle hours ???. Shane ... ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
