On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:55:17 +1000, "ibm-main" wrote: > From: "Gerrit Huizenga" > > > > At the same time, we'll probably lag the bleeding edge of > > akpm's tree a bit since it isn't always rock-solid stable. > > That's got to be a candidate for "understatement of the year" :) Heh heh heh... But that does suggest that you understand the issues we'll run into with respect to some of the re-work. Several of the features that we are talking about using are actually in the -mm tree today as opposed to mainline kernel. The e series currently builds stand-alone against mainline. The f series will during development have a few more growing pains although I have some ideas on how to minimize a few of those.
> > The more commonality we can find with other projects, the better. > > No argument here. And that is the basis for most of the simplification proposals I've seen, including better use of relayfs, configfs, and the core of the connector technology in its next/new form, for instance. There is also some work from the Fujitsu folks with respect to scheduler work that will be interesting to exploit in the CKRM context. In other words, you have joined the work at a point where there should be lots of excitement and probably an occasional bit of birthing pains. :) > > I expect in time that the CE's will be re-released against this set of > > core changes as well - especially the code that moves most of the CE > > to user level. > > I am looking forward to it. Me too! ;-) gerrit ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
