On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 19:10 +1000, ibm-main wrote: > Agggrhhhh !!! - forwarded to the list again. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > There was a small problem with the patch Maeda-san sent. It doesn't take > > into account that kill_sb is called even in the cases where fill_super > > failed. > > > > The patchset f0.1 addresses this. > > > > Let me know if you see any problems. > > Thanks Chandra, looks good - I am unable to reproduce (the admittedly > artificial) problems I had seen previously.
The tests you have done are valid tests(not artificial), and they did expose bugs that needed to be fixed. > > I will desist from using f0 henceforth. Why ? You volunteered to be a guinea pig and are quitting already :) IMHO, we need more people testing/reviewing f series to make it stable faster. > > Cheers ... Shane > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download > it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own > Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php > _______________________________________________ > ckrm-tech mailing list > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose.... - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | .......you may get it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
