On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:03:04 EDT, Shailabh Nagar wrote:
> ibm-main wrote:
> > From: "Gerrit Huizenga"
> > 
> >> ...  At the same time, it may be feasible to consider the f series
> >> as a patch set against the -mm tree (e.g. apply 2.6.13 + mm + ckrm
> > 
> > f-series)
> > 
> >> as we are running through development, just to keep things a *little*
> >> simpler.
> > 
> > 
> > I've been navel-gazing about this.
> > Is the -mm tree a valid basis for a pre-release "cycle"  ???. 
> 
> As of now, both -mm and mainline are equally convenient as far as 
> getting the configfs patches are concerned.
> -mm has it as part of ocfs2 (though its not independently configurable 
> from ocfs2) and the mainline patches are conveniently available from
>       http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs2/files/patches/
> for the current linus trees.
> 
> But going forward, -mm might be an easier source, particularly if the
> attempts to merge configfs with sysfs get any traction. Also, since -mm 
> is the target tree for the ckrm codebase, it'll be slightly easier to 
> maintain the ckrm patches against mm directly.        
> 
> But your points about the instability of -mm are also true...so Gerrit 
> has to make that call. The comments above are concerned only with the 
> rcfs/configfs aspect.

Well, -mm instability is actually a definite concern.  I've also
thought about pulling in any dependent patches although that has a
little bit of complexity with respect to analyzing the dependencies
of any dependent patches.  And, for submission to akpm, which is a
goal of ours, the patches will need to ultimately be against the latest
version of Linus' tree at the time.

I'll need to try extracting a few dependent patches, applying to mainline,
then applying the f series patches to see if we can create something
that is usable and stable.  That is going to take me a couple of weeks
to work through.  So, in the meantime, using -mm may be a short term
solution if the stability issues don't start eating us alive.  In the
longer term, self-contained, minimal ports against 2.6 mainline would
be the goal, much like the current e series is.

gerrit


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech

Reply via email to