On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 19:08:22 +0900 (JST) Hirokazu Takahashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - The controller only controls the time_slice value and doesn't > > care the balance of cpus (the controller leaves balancing to > > the existing balancing code in the scheduler). So far I don't > > have any good idea to solve this. > Is there any problem to enhance load_balance()? Applying some weight > to each process, it would be used for calculating load of each runqueue. Probably we can solve this issue by applying some weight to each tasks and calculating the load of runqueues based on that weight. But I can not get to the implementation out of your idea so far. > > - The controller holds a spinlock once per 1 second. I don't > > know this is permissive or not, but the current scheduler > > doesn't hold any spinlocks normally, so... > I think each runqueue has its own spinlock, which is held quite often. Ah, thanks for pointing out my mistake. Maybe I confused that with something else. Then it should be more permissive than I had thought, at least :) -- KUROSAWA, Takahiro ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
