Takahashi-san, On Tue, 11 Oct 2005 14:58:20 +0900 (JST) Hirokazu Takahashi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Kurosawa-san, how do you think these changes against your code? > > > Obviously this change may also affects your cpumeter interface code. > > > > No problem for me. > > But the problem is that people who don't know cpu_rc is also usable > > for CKRM wouldn't think those changes were essential. > > You mean it may be hard to convince CPUSETS guys to accept the changes > without any good reason, right? That's right. There might be some reason to move cpu_rc and cpu_rc_domain structure definitions into cpu_rc.h. But I can't find out other good reasons to move cpu_rc_lock()/cpu_rc_unlock() into cpu_rc.h so far. Thanks, -- KUROSAWA, Takahiro ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
