On Tue, 2005-12-13 at 20:00 +0300, Kirill Korotaev wrote: > Gerrit, Chandra, > > we have a number of questions regarding CKRM code - first of all, what > is the right place to ask them?
Yes, this list is the best place to ask questions. Welcome! > we looked through the code available at SF and basically while there is > a job to be done it does look like both CKRM and OpenVZ-UBC projects > (http://openvz.org) can benefit from each other and it is possible to > make both projects mergeable. Our questions mainly concerns what > populates the framework itself: > 1. what is the base kernel version used for CKRM? And what version is > recommended to use/investigate/study? I've been using 2.6.14 and 2.6.15 for my recent CKRM-related work (a userspace RBCE). While the core CKRM framework can often apply to newer kernel versions the controllers (released separately from the core framework) are generally more tightly bound to the kernel version. Controller authors could best describe which version(s) and how adaptable their patches have been to new kernels. Cheers, -Matt Helsley ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
