"Paul E. McKenney" (on Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:51:15 -0800) wrote: >On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 05:19:01PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote: >> OK, I have thought about it and ... >> >> notifier_call_chain_lockfree() must be called with preempt disabled. >> >Fair enough! A comment, perhaps? In a former life I would have also >demanded debug code to verify that preemption/interrupts/whatever were >actually disabled, given the very subtle nature of any resulting bugs...
Comment - OK. Debug code is not required, the reference to smp_processor_id() already does all the debug checks that notifier_call_chain_lockfree() needs. CONFIG_PREEMPT_DEBUG is your friend. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
