Hi Rajaram,
Rajaram Suryanarayanan wrote:
Hi MAEDA,
Thanks again.
No particular reason for not using 2.6.15 patch. Just I have the source
code of 2.6.14 kernel at hand. Also I guess that to have initial
understanding of CKRM functionality and code, I can just apply the patch
for 2.6.14. Also anyways the kernel is going to move on like 2.6.15,
2.6.16 etc..right ?
Please let me know if I am wrong or miss something.
You are right. We will catch up the latest kernel, and we mainly support
the current one, 2.6.15 now.
Thanks,
MAEDA Naoaki
Also , first I plan to go in to the code of CKRM and understand how
things are done. Then I will have confidence to contribute to the project.
Thanks,
Rajaram.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
What are the most popular cars? Find out at Yahoo! Autos
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=38382/_ylc=X3oDMTEzNWFva2Y2BF9TAzk3MTA3MDc2BHNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDMmF1dG9z/*http://autos.yahoo.com/newcars/popular/thisweek.html
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
