On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 14:43 +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote: > >>1. reclaiming user resources is not that good idea as it looks to you. > >>such solutions end up with lots of resources spent on reclaim. > >>for user memory reclaims mean consumption of expensive disk I/O bandwidth > >>which reduces overall system throughput and influences other users. > >> > > > > > > May be I'm overlooking something very obvious. Please tell me, what > > happens when a user hits a page fault and the page allocator is easily > > able to give a page from its pcp list. But container is over its limit > > of physical memory. In your patch there is no attempt by container > > support to see if some of the user pages are easily reclaimable. What > > options a user will have to make sure some room is created. > The patch set send doesn't control user memory! > This topic is about kernel memory... >
And that is why I asked the question in the very first mail (if this support is going to come later). -rohit ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
