Nick, > Kirill Korotaev wrote: > > >>Introduce calls to BC core over the kernel to charge locked memory. >> >>Normaly new locked piece of memory may appear in insert_vm_struct, >>but there are places (do_mmap_pgoff, dup_mmap etc) when new vma >>is not inserted by insert_vm_struct(), but either link_vma-ed or >>merged with some other - these places call BC code explicitly. >> >>Plus sys_mlock[all] itself has to be patched to charge/uncharge >>needed amount of pages. > > > > I still haven't heard your good reasons why such a complex scheme is > required when my really simple proposal of unconditionally charging > the page to the container it was allocated by. Nick can you elaborate what your proposal is? Probably I missed it somewhere...
> That has the benefit of not being full of user explotable holes and > also not putting such a huge burden on mm/ and the wider kernel in > general. I guess you will have to account locked pages still and thus complexity won't be reduced much in this regard... Thanks, Kirill ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
