On 9/21/06, Chandra Seetharaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The current fake numa support requires you to choose your node layout > > at boot time - I've been working with 64 fake nodes of 128M each, > > which gives a reasonable granularity for dividing a machine between > > multiple different sized jobs. > > It still will not satisfy what OpenVZ/Container folks are looking for: > 100s of containers.
Right - so fake-numa is not the right solution for everyone, and I never suggested that it is. (Having said that, there are discussions underway to make the zone-based approach more practical - if you could have dynamically-resizable nodes, this would be more applicable to openvz). But, there's no reason that the OpenVZ resource control mechanisms couldn't be hooked into a generic process container mechanism along with cpusets and RG. Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
