On 10/4/06, Chandra Seetharaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > All of this (and the rest of the snipped email with suggested > > improvements) makes pretty good sense. But would it not be better > > to do this in stages? > > > > 1) Split the code out from cpusets > > Paul (Menage) is already work on this.
The split out is done - right now I'm tidying up an example of RG moved over the container API - basically dumping the group membership code (since container.c supplies that) and migrating the shares/stats file model to containerfs rather than configfs. I'll try to send it out today. Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
