On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 17:16 -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
<snip>
> For those of us whose brains don't hold so many details at once,
> creating a new file system can seem a bit daunting. And for those
> of us not skilled in the art, it is more likely to end up being
> 300 lines of code, presenting several good provocations for a Hellwig
> or a Viro to curse in the general direction of their monitors.
Definitely.
> Instead of trying to hijack configfs to purposes ill suited for it,
> I wonder if there isn't someway to lower the hurdles that us mere
> mortals must leap to creating additional filesystems.
Again, I don't think using configfs to define groups of tasks is
ill-suited to the purpose of configfs. I think we're confusing the
limitations of the implementation with the purpose for having configfs
in addition to sysfs.
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
