Paul Jackson wrote: > vatsa wrote: >> C. Paul Menage's container patches >> >> Provides a generic heirarchial ... >> >> Consensus/Debated Points >> ------------------------ >> >> Consensus: >> ... >> - Dont support heirarchy for now > > Looks like this item can be dropped from the concensus ... ;).
Agree. > > I for one would recommend getting the hierarchy right from the > beginning. > > Though I can appreciate that others were trying to "keep it simple" > and postpone dealing with such complications. I don't agree. > > Such stuff as this deeply affects all that sits on it. Get the I can share our experience with it. Hierarchy support over beancounters was done in one patch. This patch altered only three places - charge/uncharge routines, beancounter creation/destruction code and BC's /proc entry. All the rest code was not modified. My point is that a good infrastrucure doesn't care wether or not beancounter (group controller) has a parent. > basic data shape presented by the kernel-user API right up front. > The rest will follow, much easier. > > Good review of the choices - thanks. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
