On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 09:29:37PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > This would forces all tasks in container A to belong to the same mem/io ctlr > groups. What if that is not desired? How would we achieve something like > this: > > tasks (m) should belong to mem ctlr group D, > tasks (n, o) should belong to mem ctlr group E > tasks (m, n, o) should belong to i/o ctlr group G > > (this example breaks the required condition/assumption that a task belong to > exactly only one process container). > > Is this a unrealistic requirement? I suspect not and should give this > flexibilty, if we ever have to support task-grouping that is > unique to each resource. Fundamentally process grouping exists because > of various resource and not otherwise.
In this article, http://lwn.net/Articles/94573/, Linus is quoted to want something close to the above example, I think. -- Regards, vatsa ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
