On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 12:23:44PM -0800, Paul Menage wrote: > In practice though, do you think the admin would really want to be > have to move individual processes around by hand? Sure, it's possible, > but wouldn't it make more sense to just give the entire student/www > class more network bandwidth? Or more generically, how often are
Wouldn't that cause -all- browsers to get enhanced network access? This is when your intention was to give one particular student's browser enhanced network access (to do online gaming) while retaining its existing cpu/mem/io limits or another particular students simulation app enhanced CPU access while retaining existing mem/io limits. > people going to be needing to move individual processes from one QoS > class to another, rather than changing the QoS for the existing class? If we are talking of tasks moving from one QoS class to another, then it can be pretty frequent in case of threaded databases and webservers. I have been told that, atleast in case of databases, depending on the workload, tasks may migrate from one group to another on every request. In general, duration of requests fall within the milliseconds to seconds range. So, IMO, design should support frequent task-migration. Also, the requirement to tune individual resource availability for specific apps/processes (ex: boost its CPU usage but retain other existing limits) may not be unrealistic. -- Regards, vatsa ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
