Hi Balbir,

The get_task_mm()/mmput(mm) usage is not correct.
With CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP=y :

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:390
in_atomic():1, irqs_disabled():0
 [<c0116620>] __might_sleep+0x97/0x9c
 [<c0116a2e>] mmput+0x15/0x8b
 [<c01582f6>] install_arg_page+0x72/0xa9
 [<c01584b1>] setup_arg_pages+0x184/0x1a5
 ...

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/fork.c:390
in_atomic():1, irqs_disabled():0
 [<c0116620>] __might_sleep+0x97/0x9c
 [<c0116a2e>] mmput+0x15/0x8b
 [<c01468ee>] do_no_page+0x255/0x2bd
 [<c0146b8d>] __handle_mm_fault+0xed/0x1ef
 [<c0111884>] do_page_fault+0x247/0x506
 [<c011163d>] do_page_fault+0x0/0x506
 [<c0348f99>] error_code+0x39/0x40


current->mm seems to be enough here.



In patch4, memctlr_dec_rss(page, mm) should be memctlr_dec_rss(page)
to compile correctly.

and in patch0 :
> 4. Disable cpuset's (to simply assignment of tasks to resource groups)
>         cd /container
>         echo 0 > cpuset_enabled

should be :
        echo 0 > cpuacct_enabled

Note : cpuacct_enabled is 0 by default.


Now the big question : to implement guarantee, the LRU needs to know
if a page can be removed from memory or not.
Any ideas to do that without any change in the struct page ?

Patrick

+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+    Patrick Le Dot
 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@bull.net         Centre UNIX de BULL SAS
 Phone : +33 4 76 29 73 20               1, Rue de Provence     BP 208
 Fax   : +33 4 76 29 76 00               38130 ECHIROLLES Cedex FRANCE
 Bull, Architect of an Open World TM
 www.bull.com

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech

Reply via email to