Paul Menage wrote:
> On 1/11/07, Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> to 0. To walk the hierarchy, I have no root now since I do not have
>> any task context. I was wondering if exporting the rootnode or providing
>> a function to export the rootnode of the mounter hierarchy will make
>> programming easier.
>
> Ah - I misunderstood what you were looking for before.
I'll try and post the changes to cpu_acct once I get the container system
working.
>
>> Something like
>>
>> struct container *get_root_container(struct container_subsys *ss)
>> {
>> return &rootnode[ss->hierarchy];
>> }
>
> Yes, something like that sounds fine - except that it would be
>
> return &rootnode[ss->hierarchy].top_container;
>
Aah! I missed the top_container bit. Do you want me to send you a patch for it?
It will be nice to have it in the next version.
> Paul
--
Balbir Singh,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM Software Labs
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
