On 2/12/07, Serge E. Hallyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well it's an unfortunate conflict, but I don't see where we have any > standing to make Paul change his terminology :)
I have no huge problem with changing my terminology in the interest of wider adoption. "Container" seems like an appropriate name for the abstraction, and possibly more appropriate than for a virtual server, but if it was decreed that the only thing stopping the container patch being merged was that it should be called, say, "Process Sets", I would happily s/container/pset/g across the entire patchset. Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
