On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 12:15:22AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > +/** > + * container_lock - lock out any changes to container structures > + * > + * The out of memory (oom) code needs to mutex_lock containers > + * from being changed while it scans the tasklist looking for a > + * task in an overlapping container.
Which specific portion of oom code cares abt container structure being intact? If I understand correctly, only cpuset requires this double locking. More specifically, cpusets cares about walking cpuset->parent list safely with callback_mutex held correct? If that is the case, I think we can push container_lock entirely inside cpuset.c and not have others exposed to this double-lock complexity. This is possible because cpuset.c (build on top of containers) still has cpuset->parent and walking cpuset->parent list safely can be made possible with a second lock which is local to only cpuset.c. -- Regards, vatsa ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
