On 3/7/07, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It makes sense in the first cpuset patch > (cpusets_using_containers.patch), but should be removed in the second > cpuset patch (multiuser_container.patch). In the 2nd patch, we use this > comparison: > > if (task_cs(p) != cs) > continue; > > cont variable introduced in the 1st patch essentially becomes unused > after 2nd patch. >
Yes, you're right - it could be removed in the 3rd patch. Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
