"Paul Menage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, Sam was saying that nsproxy should be the object that all resource > controllers hook off.
I think implementation wise this tends to make sense. However it should have nothing to do with semantics. If we have a lot of independent resource controllers. Placing the pointer to their data structures directly in nsproxy instead of in task_struct sounds like a reasonable idea but it should not be user visible. Eric ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
