On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 10:43:48PM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote: > I'm unsure here, but this 'tsk->cpuset == cs' test feels fragile to me. > > How about a bit earlier in attach_task(), right at the point we overwrite the > victim tasks cpuset pointer, we decrement the count on the old cpuset, and if > it went to zero, remember that we'll need to release it, once we've dropped > some locks:
Looks neater. Will adopt this when I send the patch. Thanks. -- Regards, vatsa ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
