On 4/3/07, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 10:10:35AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote: > > Agreed. So I'm not saying it's fundamentally a bad idea - just that > > merging container_group and nsproxy is a fairly simple space > > optimization that could easily be done later. > > IMHO, if we agree that space optimization is important, then its better > we tackle it right at design phase, rather than ripping it out later .. >
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil". I think we're in agreement that there's value in having an aggregator to avoid every task having to have a forest of pointers. But it wouldn't be a major design change to switch that aggregator from being container_group to being nsproxy at some later point. Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
