> they are indirectly related. Sorry for the noise.
Well ... if this is noise, it should be me apologizing, not you <grin>.
I'm the one who asked.
> Paul Menage's container patches provide a process aggregation mechanism,
> like PAGG did. This is a common requirement for resource management and
> other container features like resource isolation and checkpoint/restart.
So ... will you (those using the netns patches) be using Paul Menage's
containers, or competing with them for the same ends, or what?
To repeat my original question, what is the relation between the work
described on this thread (which some OLS discussions have decided to
base on the netns patches) and Paul Menage's containers and my (now the
community's) cpusets.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.925.600.0401
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
